Avançar para o conteúdo principal

Magnetic-Confinement Fusion Without the Magnets

Zap Energy’s new Z-pinch fusion reactor promises a simpler approach to an elusive goal


Zap Energy’s FuZE-Q demonstration reactor is slated for completion in mid-2022. ZAP ENERGY


 Tokamaks, which use magnets to contain the high-temperature plasma in which atomic nuclei fuse and release energy, have captured the spotlight in recent months, due to tremendous advances in superconducting magnets. Despite these gains, though, traditional magnetic-confinement fusion is still years away from fulfilling nuclear fusion’s promise of generating abundant and carbon-free electricity.


But tokamaks aren’t the only path to fusion power. Seattle-based Zap Energy’s FuZE-Q reactor, scheduled to be completed in mid-2022, bypasses the need for costly and complex magnetic coils. Instead, the machine sends pulses of electric current along a column of highly conductive plasma, creating a magnetic field that simultaneously confines, compresses, and heats the ionized gas. This Z-pinch approach—so named because the current pinches the plasma along the third, or Z, axis of a three-dimensional grid—could potentially produce energy in a device that’s simpler, smaller, and cheaper than the massive tokamaks or laser-fusion machines under development today.


Z-pinched plasmas have historically been plagued by instabilities. In the absence of a perfectly uniform squeeze, the plasma wrinkles and kinks and falls apart within tens of nanoseconds—far too short to produce useful amounts of electricity.


Zap Energy's Z-pinch design generates magnetic fields without using complex magnetic coils.


The lack of magnets makes the reactor relatively compact and less expensive than traditional magnetic-confinement fusion reactors.


Zap Energy’s approach, which it calls sheared-flow stabilization, tames these instabilities by varying the flow of plasma along the column. The design sheathes the plasma near the column’s central axis with faster-flowing plasma—imagine a steady stream of cars traveling in the center lane of a highway, unable to change lanes because heavy traffic is whizzing by on both sides. That arrangement keeps the fusion-reactive plasma corralled and compressed longer than previous Z-pinch configurations could.


“We think our reactor is the least expensive, most compact, most scalable solution with the shortest path to commercially viable fusion power,” says Ben Levitt, Zap Energy’s director of research and development. Levitt predicts that Zap will reach Q=1, or scientific breakeven—the point at which the energy released by the fusing atoms is equal to the energy required to create the conditions for fusion—by mid-2023, which would make it the first fusion project to do so.


Given the long history of broken promises in fusion-energy research, that’s the sort of claim that warrants skepticism. But Zap’s ascent of a forbiddingly steep technology curve has been swift and impressive. The startup was founded in 2017 as a spin-off of the FuZE (Fusion Z-pinch Experiment) research team at the University of Washington. The company produced its first fusion reactions the very next year. Before the company’s founding, the university team had collaborated with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory researchers. They won a series of U.S. Department of Energy grants that enabled them to test the sheared-flow approach at progressively higher energy levels. To date, the company has raised more than US $40 million.


An illustration showing the flow of plasma through a novel type of fusion reactor.

As deuterium gas is injected into Zap Energy’s FuZE-Q reactor, electrodes introduce synchronous pulses, which strip electrons from the deuterium atoms to create a plasma, or ionized gas. The plasma accelerates toward the assembly region, where the current creates a radial shear, or pinch, in the plasma flow. This magnetic field maintains stability as it simultaneously confines, compresses, and heats the plasma to fusion conditions.ZAP ENERGY


Thus far, experiments have confirmed simulations that predict the plasma will stay stable as Z-pinch currents are amped up. The new machine, budgeted to cost about $4 million, will dial up the strength of the pulses from 500 kiloamperes to more than 650 kA—the approximate threshold at which Levitt and his team believe they can demonstrate breakeven.


“Will the plasma stay stable as we keep increasing the energy we’re putting into it? That’s the trillion-dollar question,” Levitt says. “We have lots of high-fidelity simulations showing that the physics doesn’t change, that the sheared-flow mechanism works as we go to higher inherent energy. But we need proof, and we’re not that far away.”


The real world has often made a mockery of the most confident simulation-based predictions—especially in plasma physics, where unexpected instabilities tend to pop up with the slightest change in conditions. And even if the new FuZE-Q machine achieves scientific breakeven, it will be left to a future machine to produce the even higher currents necessary to surpass engineering breakeven, where the electric power at the output exceeds what’s needed to produce the fusion reaction. Zap hopes to reach that milestone in 2026.


“Will the plasma stay stable as we keep increasing the energy we’re putting into it? That’s the trillion-dollar question.”

—Ben Levitt, Zap Energy


“Going back decades, a lot of teams have tried to make the Z-pinch approach work, and now Zap has found a way to stabilize it with the sheared flow,” says Matt Moynihan, a former nuclear engineer for the Navy and a fusion consultant. “It’s exciting that it’s working under the conditions they’ve tested, but now we’ll need to see if that stability holds when they scale up the power enough to get net energy out of it.”


What no one disputes is the critical need for a carbon-free, always-available electricity source. Nuclear fusion could be it, but mainstream approaches are too costly and advancing too slowly to make an impact on the climate crisis. Zap’s reactor could also be applied someday to advanced space propulsion. Attached to a spacecraft, the end of a Z-pinch reactor could be left open to allow the fast-moving plasma to escape, releasing a jet of material that could propel a spacecraft forward.


At this point, both fusion-powered space flight and fusion-powered electricity remain in the theoretical realm—but Zap Energy is aiming for the stars.


This article appears in the January 2022 print issue as "A Pinch of Fusion."


https://spectrum.ieee.org/amp/zap-energy-fusion-reactor-2656045500

Comentários

Notícias mais vistas:

Constância e Caima

  Fomos visitar Luís Vaz de Camões a Constância, ver a foz do Zêzere, e descobrimos que do outro lado do arvoredo estava escondida a Caima, Indústria de Celulose. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4L07iwnI0M&list=PL7htBtEOa_bqy09z5TK-EW_D447F0qH1L&index=16

Armazenamento holográfico

 Esta técnica de armazenamento de alta capacidade pode ser uma das respostas para a crescente produção de dados a nível mundial Quando pensa em hologramas provavelmente associa o conceito a uma forma futurista de comunicação e que irá permitir uma maior proximidade entre pessoas através da internet. Mas o conceito de holograma (que na prática é uma técnica de registo de padrões de interferência de luz) permite que seja explorado noutros segmentos, como o do armazenamento de dados de alta capacidade. A ideia de criar unidades de armazenamento holográficas não é nova – o conceito surgiu na década de 1960 –, mas está a ganhar nova vida graças aos avanços tecnológicos feitos em áreas como os sensores de imagem, lasers e algoritmos de Inteligência Artificial. Como se guardam dados num holograma? Primeiro, a informação que queremos preservar é codificada numa imagem 2D. Depois, é emitido um raio laser que é passado por um divisor, que cria um feixe de referência (no seu estado original) ...

TAP: quo vadis?

 É um erro estratégico abismal decidir subvencionar uma vez mais a TAP e afirmar que essa é a única solução para garantir a conectividade e o emprego na aviação, hotelaria e turismo no país. É mentira! Nos últimos 20 anos assistiu-se à falência de inúmeras companhias aéreas. 11 de Setembro, SARS, preço do petróleo, crise financeira, guerras e concorrência das companhias de baixo custo, entre tantos outros fatores externos, serviram de pano de fundo para algo que faz parte das vicissitudes de qualquer empresa: má gestão e falta de liquidez para enfrentar a mudança. Concentremo-nos em três casos europeus recentes de companhias ditas “de bandeira” que fecharam as portas e no que, de facto, aconteceu. Poucos meses após a falência da Swissair, em 2001, constatou-se um fenómeno curioso: um número elevado de salões de beleza (manicure, pedicure, cabeleireiros) abriram igualmente falência. A razão é simples, mas só mais tarde seria compreendida: muitos desses salões sustentavam-se das assi...